<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Alexey Zakhlestin's blog - Latest Comments in Unicode vs. Programming Languages</title><link>http://alexeyzakhlestinsblog.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://alexeyzakhlestinsblog.disqus.com/unicode_vs_programming_languages/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 07:28:25 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Unicode vs. Programming Languages</title><link>http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/2007/07/unicode-vs-programming-languages/#comment-6408630</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mgcci: such input is easily achieved using macro-expandersâ€¦ such as TextExpander (on mac)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am sure there are similiar tools for other platforms&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexey Zakhlestin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 07:28:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unicode vs. Programming Languages</title><link>http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/2007/07/unicode-vs-programming-languages/#comment-6408628</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I would love this to happen.&lt;br&gt;If I can input these things easily..&lt;br&gt;Like every time I want a square root sign I have to go to online and search "square root UTF" to find it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mgccl</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 07:14:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unicode vs. Programming Languages</title><link>http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/2007/07/unicode-vs-programming-languages/#comment-6408626</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Finally, a use for all the keys on the space cadet keyboard! :D&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Dennehy</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 07:03:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unicode vs. Programming Languages</title><link>http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/2007/07/unicode-vs-programming-languages/#comment-6408627</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dominik del Bondio: user-definable operators are possible in Haskell (and I guess some other languages) tooâ€¦&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I want to see that as a "native feature" (aliased to standard ascii-operators)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexey Zakhlestin</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 04:08:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unicode vs. Programming Languages</title><link>http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/2007/07/unicode-vs-programming-languages/#comment-6408612</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here's an implementation for PHP6... Have fun with it!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.libssh2.org/index.php?/archives/69-Fun-with-unicode.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://blog.libssh2.org/index.php?/archives/69-Fun-with-unicode.html"&gt;http://blog.libssh2.org/ind...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sara Golemon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 23:23:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unicode vs. Programming Languages</title><link>http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/2007/07/unicode-vs-programming-languages/#comment-6408611</link><description>&lt;p&gt;sounds like you are looking for Perl6 :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aaron Wormus</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 22:46:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unicode vs. Programming Languages</title><link>http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/2007/07/unicode-vs-programming-languages/#comment-6408616</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've got 10000 unicode symbol table here..&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://kurapov.name/unicode/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://kurapov.name/unicode/"&gt;http://kurapov.name/unicode/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Artjom Kurapov</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:13:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unicode vs. Programming Languages</title><link>http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/2007/07/unicode-vs-programming-languages/#comment-6408617</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Perl 6:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://dev.perl.org/perl6/faq.html:" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://dev.perl.org/perl6/faq.html:"&gt;http://dev.perl.org/perl6/f...&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;user-definable operators (from the full Unicode set)&lt;br&gt;and &lt;a href="http://dev.perl.org/perl6/doc/design/syn/S03.html#Hyper_Operators" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://dev.perl.org/perl6/doc/design/syn/S03.html#Hyper_Operators"&gt;http://dev.perl.org/perl6/d...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dominik del Bondio</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:00:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unicode vs. Programming Languages</title><link>http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/2007/07/unicode-vs-programming-languages/#comment-6408624</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Looks very unusual :)&lt;br&gt;Maybe it is power of habit or inertness of thinking :D&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">endeveit</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 12:19:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unicode vs. Programming Languages</title><link>http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/2007/07/unicode-vs-programming-languages/#comment-6408623</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sebastian: that just means, that your font doesn't support that symbolâ€¦ :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, a lot of windows-fonts have poor unicode-support.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexey Zakhlestin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 12:16:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unicode vs. Programming Languages</title><link>http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/2007/07/unicode-vs-programming-languages/#comment-6408625</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here you already see the problems, Unicode introduces: The replacement you want for "-&amp;gt;" (an Arrow) renders as "&amp;gt;" on my computer that doesn't have a very exotic configuration: WinXP + Firefox (German version both)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sebastian</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 12:09:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unicode vs. Programming Languages</title><link>http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/2007/07/unicode-vs-programming-languages/#comment-6408619</link><description>&lt;p&gt;hartmut:&lt;br&gt;- typing unicode can be not-so-painful if OS gives a helping hand&lt;br&gt;- auto replacement is a personal choice&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;anyway, I think I made it clear, that both of these options (good'ol ascii and pretty unicode) should be supported by compilers/interpreters, imho.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;and non-unicode-aware editor is something I don't want to face (actually I am quite happy, that these days I can use unicode on mac, linux, freebsd, openbsd and solaris)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;and pretty-printing is a source of confusionâ€¦ because whenever you read pretty-printed document and try to type it in, you get problemsâ€¦&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexey Zakhlestin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 12:09:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unicode vs. Programming Languages</title><link>http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/2007/07/unicode-vs-programming-languages/#comment-6408621</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Regin Too many keys :p&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 12:01:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unicode vs. Programming Languages</title><link>http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/2007/07/unicode-vs-programming-languages/#comment-6408618</link><description>&lt;p&gt;- typing unicode -&amp;gt; no way&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- auto replacement -&amp;gt; i'd rather have "what you type is what you get"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- pretty printing -&amp;gt; tools like a2ps have been supporting this for ages&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- and then there's the situation every once in a while where you have to modify code on a deployment system on which $EDITOR is not unicode aware yet ...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hartmut</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:58:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unicode vs. Programming Languages</title><link>http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/2007/07/unicode-vs-programming-languages/#comment-6408622</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hmmm... what about unicode keyboards?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Regin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:53:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unicode vs. Programming Languages</title><link>http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/2007/07/unicode-vs-programming-languages/#comment-6408620</link><description>&lt;p&gt;endeveit: because it looks cool ;)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;a = 2;&lt;br&gt;b = 30;&lt;br&gt;Ñ = {qq: 3, zz: 4}&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;while (b â‰¥ a) {&lt;br&gt;    a Ã—= câ†’qq;&lt;br&gt;}&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;â†‘b;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexey Zakhlestin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:35:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unicode vs. Programming Languages</title><link>http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/2007/07/unicode-vs-programming-languages/#comment-6408615</link><description>&lt;p&gt;But what for?&lt;br&gt;Could you tell in details?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">endeveit</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:21:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unicode vs. Programming Languages</title><link>http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/2007/07/unicode-vs-programming-languages/#comment-6408614</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Tobias: that's an easy part, as there are a lot of utilities which do such changes in any application (I know at least 2 such tools for mac and 1 such tool for windows)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexey Zakhlestin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:14:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unicode vs. Programming Languages</title><link>http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/2007/07/unicode-vs-programming-languages/#comment-6408613</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hehe and an IDE that automatically makes the replacement after you type the ascii combinations.&lt;br&gt;Because I don't want to enter the unicode when writing one of those :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tobias Struckmeier</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:09:05 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>